<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>http://ojthedog.com &#187; nrts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ojthedog.com/tag/nrts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ojthedog.com</link>
	<description>multi purpose blog and bull terrier stud service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:28:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Snuff Tobacco</title>
		<link>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/snuff-tobacco/</link>
		<comments>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/snuff-tobacco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy cheap cigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy ryo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy snuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap snuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nrt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nrts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryo tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snuff info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snuff information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojthedog.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many experienced users prefer snuff over even the venerable cigar for satisfaction and pleasure.Snuff is most likely the safest way to use tobacco and much more enjoyable than anything Big Pharma has to offer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snuff, simply put, is dried tobacco leaf crushed to a powder for snorting or more accurately sniffing.   One of the oldest if not the oldest form of use along with chewing.   Several times throughout history  Snuff has been regarded as the most desirable method to enjoy tobacco even matched against the reviled cigarette.   Modern Snuff can be that simple to this day or it can be refined to an even more effective and appealing product.  Snuff is of course, smoke and expectorant, or spit-free.  Many experienced users even prefer it over the venerable cigar for satisfaction and pleasure.   Snuff is most likely the safest way to use tobacco and much more enjoyable than anything Big Pharma has to offer.</p>
<p>Snorting powdered tobacco, or more commonly, snuffing and sniffing, can be quite pleasurable and satisfying when performed correctly.  The degree of satisfaction will differ greatly between individuals as the quality of an individuals technique will vary greatly.   Many new snuffers have the misconception that snuff is less efficient than some other smoking alternatives like Snus and chewing tobacco.  However, some snuffers tested clinically achieved higher blood serum levels of nicotine than both snussers and cigarette smokers alike.  Snuff makes for an excellent NRT in those who are able to master the skill and a frustrating one for those who haven&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Before snuffing can become a total replacement the cigarette smoker needs some patience and practice in order to receive an adequate supply of nicotine.  The casual <em>toffeenose</em> who isn&#8217;t addicted to cigarettes or chew generally has a relatively low addiction and doesn&#8217;t need the copious amounts of nicotine smokers require.  Many snuff makers concentrate on flavor and ease of use to satisfy this longtime clientele.   The burgeoning popularity of smoke-free tobacco alternatives has smokers looking for an instant replacement and are often frustrated with some of these more popular products.</p>
<p>While finding a strong Snuff is an important step for those interested in giving this old habit a try, mastery of the &#8220;art of snuffing&#8221; is first and foremost.  Snuff is not simply snorted as any powdered tobacco getting into the nasal cavity itself will be met with searing pain that unfortunately has newbies quickly opting for another NRT.  Snuff is sniffed, lightly at first until the newbie feels confident and progresses to gradually increase the dose.  Beginner Snuff products, while being fairly low in nicotine, will teach the new snuffer the correct form without much risk of a painful and premature end to their new hobby.  These moist and highly flavored snuffs are also a pleasure to use and many an experienced snuffer will still keep them in daily rotation.</p>
<p>Once mastered, the new snuffer will have hundreds of choices of flavors, grinds and moisture levels to choose from.  Snuff has the largest array of products of any tobacco product and experimentation is part of the fun.  The cost of snuffing is another plus and is a fraction of any other tobacco product.   The heaviest of snuffers would have a hard time sniffing more than a couple dollars worth a day and most spend even less than that.    It goes without saying tobacco Nazi&#8217;s will jump all over this too, spreading  misinformation and confusing oral tobacco studies with snuff.  It&#8217;s highly doubtful the low tax rate currently enjoyed by snuffers will go unpunished once it becomes popular and profitable.  Ironically, the 80 some year old tradition of keeping a filled Snuffbox in our Senate exists to this day.</p>
<p>Some great snuff resources:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snuffhouse.org">Snuffhouse forum</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.snufftalk.org/">Snufftalk info and forum</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.snuffbox.org.uk/">Snuffbox info site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/snuff-tobacco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic Cigs II</title>
		<link>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/electronic-cigs-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/electronic-cigs-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti smokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti smoking agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e cigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic cigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic smokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nrt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nrts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke juice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojthedog.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last ad read; "it's a fact, smoking kills 400,000 people a year in the US".  Oh yeah, say's who?  The same people who say Moslim's  want to eat your children?  I doubt they all do.  Stats are a telltale sign to ignore the writers point as the opposite is probably closer to the truth.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading my 2 cents recently on the new Electronic cigarettes that are being touted as both the latest and greatest cessation aid along with being the best long term smoking substitute, one could say I was less than impressed to say the least.  I wanted to like these things and gave them more than a fair shot several times but came away with a bitter taste in my mouth regardless, and it wasn&#8217;t from the leaky e-cig either.    The devices do work, to an extent.  Electronic cigs do deliver a substantial amount of vapor supposedly containing varying amounts of nicotine.  Whether there&#8217;s any nicotine in them or not, I have no idea,  but none of the liquids impressed me in the least.  Fine and good, case closed.   But my curiosity about them and the prevalence of ads pertaining to them makes it difficult to totally forget their existence though.  In running across these ads,  posted on every other website, I&#8217;m becoming  more and more disgusted with the marketing strategies being used. The last ad I just read states:  &#8220;it&#8217;s a fact, <a href="http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results.html?artid=1555">smoking kills 400,000 people a year i</a>n the US&#8221;.  Is that right, say&#8217;s who?  Legislators,  statisticians, special interest groups such as ASH and their brainwashed followers&#8230;   Stats are the telltale sign that your talking to a liar and the opposite is more often closer to the truth.  I don&#8217;t see how preaching this anti tobacco propaganda to smokers is gonna make this product appealing and might have the opposite effect.</p>
<p>The point of these ads is becoming closer and closer to anti-smoking rhetoric.  The general strategy is to quote inflammatory junk science that groups such as ASH use to propagate and increase hostility between smokers and the rest of the world.  The ads that make smoker&#8217;s crave a smoke, that&#8217;s no joke.   The hostility being used in turn to incite the naive do-gooders and nanny types to raise Cain against smokers (who pay their salaries by the way) and keep on keeping on with the malfeasance.  That these idiots are using this junk science is not surprising, all&#8217;s fair in war and marketing.   But, that these new &#8220;ex-smokers&#8221; take these views to heart  is beyond ludicrous.  Just months prior they were refuting the junk science and propaganda that has recently swayed them to the Dark Side.   Where&#8217;s their pride, much less character?   In effect, they&#8217;re admitting themselves fools and that anti sentiment has been right all along,  if that&#8217;s the case, why quote fictitious studies?  What a bunch of spineless sheople.</p>
<p>Not that their ineffectiveness wasn&#8217;t enough to avoid these new toys but the guilt by association with the new ex-smoking traitors is more than I could bear.  When I had quit smoking those seven years, several years ago, I never allowed myself to don the cap of the anti.  That&#8217;s an easy temptation to fall for, the superiority over a whole class of people by one&#8217;s own act of quitting.  I couldn&#8217;t quit using one of these things much less do a 180 in my convictions.  I need nicotine and I don&#8217;t relish in the &#8220;look&#8221; of being a smoker, which is essentially what these things do accomplish.  I remember the kids in smokers court of my youth who would follow their smoking friends into the smoking areas and make a  dramatic show of smoking, to be &#8220;cool&#8221; I suppose.  Funny that they picked up a little addiction too, serves em right.   I think the e-cig is a great thing for these folks, to keep up the &#8220;illusion of smoking&#8221; when they were never very heavy smokers to begin with.</p>
<p>Smoking isn&#8217;t something anyone takes pride in.  Smoking is a profound addiction that neither candy cigarettes nor faux electronic smoke will easily cure.   Looks like these vendors are trying to swell the ranks of the anti&#8217;s with new recruits though.  Wonder how long the probationary period for ex-smokers is before regaining full human status in the anti&#8217;s eyes, how much re-education is needed before full re-admission.   Looks like hypocrisy is good for a few brownie points to start.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/Javascripts/PisV3.js"></script><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/javascripts/DataV3.ashx?ImageId=355933&amp;PublisherId=11967"></script><img id="picappimg" title="careful, you might be next" src="http://cdn.picapp.com/ftp/editors/7/d/a/2/18.JPG" alt="F-18 Crashes Into Residential Neighborhood Of San Diego" width="420" height="264" /></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><em>Who&#8217;s next on the Nanny&#8217;s list?</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/electronic-cigs-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic Cigarette</title>
		<link>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/electronic-cigarette/</link>
		<comments>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/electronic-cigarette/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco alternative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drip smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric cigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic cigarette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic cigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nrt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nrts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke juice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yentyl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojthedog.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should be in the last throes of nicotine poisoning or at the very least, flopping around like a freshly boated fish,  clutching at my chest and hurriedly making peace with my Maker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An electronic device consisting of a metal tube, a vaporizer, pressure switch, circuits  and a diode indicating operation,  all of this housing a rechargeable battery.   This thing resembles a cigarette from a distance but most are generally a bit larger, colorful models are also available along with options resembling pipes and cigars.  A liquid advertised to contain nicotine is either manually dripped or fed from a cartridge housed in the unit onto the vapouriser thus creating &#8220;smoke&#8221; or more accurately vapor which the user inhales to emulate smoking.  The vapor consists of a measured amount of either propylene glycol and/or glycerin, water and assorted others such as flavorings, nicotine and probably preservatives and stabilizers.  The propylene glycol A.K.A PG and/or glycerol, liquids used in <a href="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:kyS4YAW3SE9nvM:http://www.khcateringequipmenthire.co.uk/images/equipment/29smokeMachine.jpg">Smoke Machines</a> operate on the same principal scaled to handheld size.  An intriguing concept,  for smokers at least, to be sure.   What depths the anti-smoking coalition have forced the depraved tobacco-phile to sink.  But how do they work, or more accurately smoke?</p>
<p>I bought one of these devices more out of curiosity than anything else but was very excited at the prospect of smoking in the faces of the antis inside their newly commandeered safe havens; restaurants and believe it or not NON SMOKING bars?  Good for at least a few giggles and maybe a exhibition or two, waving my perfectly legal alternative in front of the smoke Nazi&#8217;s (that are forcing our hand in the first place).   The unit does accomplish this to some degree; create the optical illusion of smoking.   How does it taste though, and more importantly, feel?  In testing the unit I bought, a generic copy of the &#8220;Yentyl&#8221;,  one of the more popular available,  that ran about $100.00 along with two brands of the highest &#8220;test&#8221; smoke juice and cartridge system available at the time;  24mg per ml.  Total cost; about $140.00,  I wanted this to work.</p>
<p>Although not being one of the most expensive units available, the unit I bought performed quite well.  From what I gather,  many of these units are manufactured side by side and labeled or, like mine, not labeled, hence generic.  This device created prodigious clouds of vapor which reasonably emulated smoke, visually at least.  The taste in both samples was slight and dissimilar from any tobacco product I&#8217;ve ever had, but not altogether unpleasant.  The feel of the vapor is lacking compared to real smoke, really almost no feel as to be and irritatingly light.  There was no lungfeel either, one of the great pleasures of smoking is missing.   There is a slight discomfort that can be compared to real smoke,  I suppose a result of inhaling vaporized PG/glycerin,  that is arguably comforting.   The deal maker, or breaker in this case is however nicotine satisfaction.</p>
<p>Remember, I was using two popular smoke juices containing the highest nicotine content available at the time; 24mg/ml.   One in liquid form to be dripped directly onto the atomizer, the other,  a cartridge which screws onto the unit and resembles the filter of a cigarette when in place.   I alluded to &#8220;advertised&#8221; nicotine content earlier and the reason why is that,  after over 60(!) inhalations, when I should be in the last throws of nicotine poisoning or at the very least (5-10 recommended), flopping around like a freshly boated fish,  clutching at my chest and hurriedly making peace with my Maker,  I was still hankerin for a smoke!  That did it for me, these devices didn&#8217;t deliver enough nicotine, even in mega doses,  to catch a case of the hiccups.   I didn&#8217;t do this seemingly foolhearty act on my first trial.  After dozens of tries &#8220;the recommended way&#8221; I grew frustrated and slowly built up and eventually realized it didn&#8217;t matter how many puffs I took.  I stopped at 50, 60 and finally 80 to give what I feel was a fair trial and experienced no bad reactions whatsoever.</p>
<p>I was disappointed to say the least that a 24mg/ml cartridge which claims to equal a pack of smokes can be finished in a sitting without the discomfort normally associated with nicotine poisoning much less the stroke or heart attack that it mathematically and biologically demanded.  Not even a bit of discomfort.  This could mean several things I suppose;   The absorption of nicotine is not linear; meaning 24mg inhaled is not nearly that much ingested.  This is a reasonable theory as nicotine isn&#8217;t linear in any other format neither, save injection.   It could also mean the cartridge does not contain nearly as much, if any, of the nicotine advertised.   Or, maybe the nicotine is destroyed in the process  (which seems unlikely because the element is at a much lower temp than a burning cigarette).  Nope, I can only surmise the manufacturer are using a &#8220;magical&#8221; nicotine with much different properties from the nicotine we are normally exposed and accustomed to.    All kidding aside, I did feel a little dizzy but attribute that to the diligent and repetitive breathing procedure used during the test, like breathing into a paper bag.  One use I suppose could be to ingest massive doses of carbon dioxide which might prove beneficial for sudden panic attack syndrome, or  SPAS.</p>
<p>Will this invention help smokers quit?  I&#8217;m no doctor nor an expert other than the anecdotal knowledge acquired from a rather heavy, near 30 year affair with nicotine.  It does seem to assuage the cravings in a percentage of the smokers who try it.  Some claim it&#8217;s effects are profound&#8230;.. but then, some smokers don&#8217;t inhale and others get by with ultra-lights.   I can&#8217;t empathize with either of them.   If replacing the ritualistic needs of smokers is the prime concern then this device has promise.  Personally, I need rather large doses of nicotine on a regular schedule throughout the day to maintain my addiction.  The magic doesn&#8217;t work on me.   I admit, I fell for the idea of a confrontation or two with self-righteous, judgemental smoke Nazi&#8217;s and that&#8217;s where the appeal of this electronic cigarette lay for me.   These gadgets seem to me little more than the snake oils and magic potions of yesteryear.   Again, it does somehow seem to work for some and more power to them, hypnosis works for some too.</p>
<p>Perhaps in the future after lab tests, reliability issues and performance being improved this device will warrant a second look.   Till then it does work to raise eyebrows and stir up a little controversy at least in today&#8217;s politically correct, health Naziistic society that prevails    With any luck by then this hypocritical and prejudiced movement will have collapsed under it&#8217;s own bloated weight.  In the end, as they do work for some so if you have an extra couple hundred dollars laying around, give one a try.  Just don&#8217;t expect this to be anything like smoking nor satisfy in the same way.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/Javascripts/PisV3.js"></script><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/javascripts/DataV3.ashx?ImageId=302646&amp;PublisherId=10311"></script><a href="http://www.picapp.com/PublicSite/ViewDetails.aspx?ImageId=2355040" target="_blank"><img id="picappimg" src="http://cdn.picapp.com/ftp/editors/d/a/d/4/46.JPG" alt="UFO Sighting" width="420" height="311" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><em>Is this alien technology and therefore biologically inert to earthlings?</em></div>
<div style="text-align:center;">Addendum: More than one e-cig company advertises tobacco-free smoke-juice or liquid nicotine.   While  sources of nicotine other than tobacco do exist;  potatoes, eggplants and tomatoes to name a few, the amount of nicotine is trivial and requires an exorbitant amount of raw material to extract a useful amount.  Not surprisingly, the tobacco-free sources aren&#8217;t specifically cited.</div>
<div style="text-align:center;">*<em><span style="color: #333300;"> Just for the record, I bet when e-cig &#8220;juice&#8221; reaches 100+mg/ml these devices will be more effective for more people.  The reason is that Big Pharma&#8217;s vaping units operate at a 20% efficiency ratio as opposed to the e-cigs claimed 100%.   Coincidentally, the only test I&#8217;ve read being performed that measured the efficacy states the c-cig, at 24mg/ml, was about one fifth as strong as a real cigarette.    I seriously doubt this rudimentary technology is more efficient than Big Pharmas. </span></em><em><span style="color: #333300;">This is conducive to the idea that about 20% of 100mg/ml would deliver a cigarette-sized dosage in a comparable number of puffs. </span></em><em><span style="color: #333300;"> </span></em></div>
<div style="text-align:center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><strong>Caveat Emptor:</strong> <em>Researching these gadgets is crucial when purchasing your unit.  The branded units are  manufactured by the same Chinese factories, on the same lines as the much cheaper generic models.  Reselling in this new market is not only commonplace, it&#8217;s the rule.  The same branded unit is most likely the same unit at 1/3 the cost on Ebay.   The advantage to a branded unit is customer service.  If that&#8217;s important enough to pay 3-4X the amount for the same unit sans a sticker then by all means, it&#8217;s your money and you&#8217;ll soon be parted.   An argument can be made to purchase several of the generic units for the same price as one branded e-cig.  A couple of interesting forums and info sites are below and spending several hours researching may save you hundreds.  Learn from their mistakes and good luck!</em></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><a title="International e-cig forum" href="http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/index.php">International e-cig forum</a></div>
<div style="text-align:center;">and&#8230;.</div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><a title="US e-cig forum" href="http://www.ecigforum.com">US e-cig forum</a></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/Javascripts/PisV3.js"></script><script src="http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/javascripts/DataV3.ashx?ImageId=302636&amp;PublisherId=10311"></script><script type="text/javascript"><!--
var iamInit = function() {try{initIamServingHandler(420,311,302636,"http://cdn.pis.picapp.com/IamProd/Resources/Css/css2.css")}catch(ex){}}()
// --></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ojthedog.com/uncategorized/electronic-cigarette/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
